Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Analytic determinacy and 0#. [REVIEW]Leo Harrington - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (4):685 - 693.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • (1 other version)Proper forcing and remarkable cardinals II.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1481-1492.
    The current paper proves the results announced in [5]. We isolate a new large cardinal concept, "remarkability." Consistencywise, remarkable cardinals are between ineffable and ω-Erdos cardinals. They are characterized by the existence of "O # -like" embeddings; however, they relativize down to L. It turns out that the existence of a remarkable cardinal is equiconsistent with L(R) absoluteness for proper forcings. In particular, said absoluteness does not imply Π 1 1 determinacy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Adding a closed unbounded set.J. E. Baumgartner, L. A. Harrington & E. M. Kleinberg - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (2):481-482.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Harrington’s principle in higher order arithmetic.Yong Cheng & Ralf Schindler - 2015 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 80 (2):477-489.
    LetZ2,Z3, andZ4denote 2nd, 3rd, and 4thorder arithmetic, respectively. We let Harrington’s Principle, HP, denote the statement that there is a realxsuch that everyx-admissible ordinal is a cardinal inL. The known proofs of Harrington’s theorem “$Det\left$implies 0♯exists” are done in two steps: first show that$Det\left$implies HP, and then show that HP implies 0♯exists. The first step is provable inZ2. In this paper we show thatZ2+ HP is equiconsistent with ZFC and thatZ3+ HP is equiconsistent with ZFC + there exists a remarkable (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations