Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Disclosing misattributed paternity.Lainie Friedman Ross - 1996 - Bioethics 10 (2):114–130.
    ABSTRACTIn 1994, the Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks of the Institute of Medicine published their recommendations regarding the ethical issues raised by advances in genetics. One of the Committee's recommendation was to inform women when test results revealed misattributed paternity, but not to disclose this information to the women's partners. The Committee's reason for withholding such information was that “'genetic testing should not be used in ways that disrupt families”. In this paper, I argue that the Committee's conclusion in favour (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Disclosing Misattributed Paternity.Lainie Friedman Ross - 1996 - Bioethics 10 (2):114-130.
    In 1994, the Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks of the Institute of Medicine published their recommendations regarding the ethical issues raised by advances in genetics. One of the Committee's recommendation was to inform women when test results revealed misattributed paternity, but not to disclose this information to the women's partners. The Committee's reason for withholding such information was that “'genetic testing should not be used in ways that disrupt families”. In this paper, I argue that the Committee's conclusion in favour (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • DNA Banking and Informed Consent: Part 1.Robert F. Weir & Jay R. Horton - 1995 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (4):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The question not asked: The challenge of pleiotropic genetic tests.Robert Samuel Wachbroit - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.
    : Nearly all of the literature on the ethical, legal, or social issues surrounding genetic tests has proceeded on the assumption that any particular test for a gene mutation yields information about only one disease condition. Even though the phenomenon of pleiotropy, where a single gene has multiple, apparently unrelated phenotypic effects, is widely recognized in genetics, it has not had much significance for genetic testing until recently. In this article, I examine a moral dilemma created by one sort of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations