Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Placebo Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?Peter A. Clark - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):58-68.
    In April 1999, Dr. Curt Freed of the University of Colorado in Denver and Dr. Stanley Fahn of Columbia Presbyterian Center in New York presented the results of a four-year, $5.7 million government-financed study using tissue from aborted fetuses to treat Parkinson’s disease at a conference of the American Academy of Neurology. The results of the first government-financed, placebo-controlled clinical study using fetal tissue showed that the symptoms of some Parkinson’s patients had been relieved. This research study involved forty subjects, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Thinking Clearly about Research Risk: Implications of the Work of Benjamin Freedman.Charles Weijer - 1999 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 21 (6):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • I Need a Placebo like I Need a Hole in the Head.Charles Weijer - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):69-72.
    In this issue of the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Peter Clark provides a comprehensive and sound ethical analysis of clinical trials examining the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease with fetal tissue transplantation. These studies raise profound questions about how clinical trials of surgical interventions ought to be conducted. At stake is not only the ethical basis of such trials, but differing views as to the proper role of science in medicine and its limitations.Experience with the broader debate on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • (1 other version)Sham surgery: An ethical analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):157-166.
    Surgical clinical trials have seldom used a “sham” or placebo surgical procedure as a control, owing to ethical concerns. Recently, several ethical commentators have argued that sham surgery is either inherently or presumptively unethical. In this article I contend that these arguments are mistaken, and that there are no sound ethical reasons for an absolute prohibition of sham surgery in clinical trials. Reflecting on three cases of sham surgery, especially on the recently reported results of a sham-controlled trial of arthroscopic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • (1 other version)Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):41-48.
    Surgical clinical trials have seldom used a "sham" or placebo surgical procedure as a control, owing to ethical concerns. Recently, several ethical commentators have argued that sham surgery is either inherently or presumptively unethical. In this article I contend that these arguments are mistaken and that there are no sound ethical reasons for an absolute prohibition of sham surgery in clinical trials. Reflecting on three cases of sham surgery, especially on the recently reported results of a sham-controlled trial of arthroscopic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Doing Evil to Achieve Good.Richard Mccormick & Paul Ramsey - 1980 - Ethics 90 (4):614-616.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Forgive and Remember.Charles L. Bosk - 1980 - Ethics 90 (2):308-310.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations