Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Measuring the relative importances of social responsibility components: A decision modeling approach. [REVIEW]Barbara A. Spencer & John K. Butler - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):573 - 577.
    In this study, a decision modeling approach is used to measure the relative importances of four social responsibility components. When given information concerning the economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic activities of 16 hypothetical organizations, 159 junior and senior management students judged the social responsibility of these firms. The study used two types of analysis: first, a within-subject regression, then a between-subject ANOVA. Results showed ethical behavior to be most important in judging social responsibility; legal behavior was second, discretionary behavior third, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • The corporation and profits.David E. Schrader - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):589 - 601.
    In this paper I argue that a theory of the firm that takes profit maximizing to be the essential activity and purpose of the firm is seriously inadequate. I argue that firms in the actual economy neither are nor should be maximizers of profit. I argue instead that firms are and must be satisficers, that they must make enough profit to satisfy the various demands which they encounter in their operation. Yet it should be clear that the notion of satisficing, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Moral and conceptual issues in investment and finance: An overview. [REVIEW]Craig K. Lehman - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):3 - 8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The ethics of investing.William B. Irvine - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (3):233 - 242.
    In this paper, I examine various popular notions concerning the ethics of investing. I first consider and reject the absolutist view that it is always wrong to invest in evil companies and the view that what makes investments in evil companies morally objectionable is the fact that by making such investments, investors are taking steps to benefit from the wrongdoing of others. I then defend the view that what makes certain investments morally objectionable is the fact that by making such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • The moral responsibilities of stockholders.Richard J. Klonoski - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):385 - 390.
    This paper attempts to address the question of the ethical obligations of stockholders. Having presumed a rather narrow conception of the nature of property, and citing the limitations on stockholders rights and/or power, some have suggested that stockholders have no significant moral responsibilities. Others say that stockholders have moral responsibilities which they derive from the fact that the shareholders of a corporation are the legal owners of it. This article first of all, contests the view that stockholders have no responsibilities (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Contrasting corporate profiles: Women and minority representation in top management positions.Gerald E. Fryxell & Linda D. Lerner - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (5):341 - 352.
    This paper investigates the characteristics of firms which have underrepresented groups in top management positions and those which do not. It is argued that profiles of these characteristics will be different for firms with minorities vs. women and that these profiles will be different depending on whether representation is by board membership or through officerships. A discriminant analysis found both similarities and differences in variables that were associated with these different forms of representation. It was found, for example, that size (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Corporate social responsibility and organizational effectiveness: A multivariate approach. [REVIEW]Shaker A. Zahra & Michael S. LaTour - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):459 - 467.
    In this paper, three major themes in research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) are identified. Of particular interest, however, is the potential link between CSR and organizational effectiveness (OE). Data collected from 410 college graduate and undergraduate students were used to examine this relationship. Using factor analysis, eight dimensions of CSR and three components of OE were extracted. Canonical analysis was then performed. The result supports the proposition that specific CSR practices affect select OE outcomes. In addition, the method employed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • An Empirical Study of the Predictors of Corporate Social Performance: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis.Linda D. Lerner & Gerald E. Fryxell - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (12):951 - 959.
    This study examines corporate social performance (CSP) as a multi-dimensional concept and relates each dimension to a variety of explanatory variables. Regression analysis is used to test the proposition that the determinants of CSP will vary with the dimension of CSP under investigation. The results of this exploratory analysis indicate they relate in unique patterns to the different measures of social performance. Implications for future research are discussed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations