Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Pretopologies and completeness proofs.Giovanni Sambin - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):861-878.
    Pretopologies were introduced in [S], and there shown to give a complete semantics for a propositional sequent calculus BL, here called basic linear logic, as well as for its extensions by structural rules,ex falso quodlibetor double negation. Immediately after Logic Colloquium '88, a conversation with Per Martin-Löf helped me to see how the pretopology semantics should be extended to predicate logic; the result now is a simple and fully constructive completeness proof for first order BL and virtually all its extensions, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Extended bar induction in applicative theories.Gerard R. Renardel de Lavalette - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (2):139-189.
    TAPP is a total applicative theory, conservative over intuitionistic arithmetic. In this paper, we first show that the same holds for TAPP+ the choice principle EAC; then we extend TAPP with choice sequences and study the principle EBIa0 . The resulting theories are used to characterise the arithmetical fragment of EL +EBIa0. As a digression, we use TAPP to show that P. Martin-Löf's basic extensional theory ML0 is conservative over intuitionistic arithmetic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Extended bar induction in applicative theories.G. R. Renardel Delavalette - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (2):139-189.
    TAPP is a total applicative theory, conservative over intuitionistic arithmetic. In this paper, we first show that the same holds for TAPP+ the choice principle EAC; then we extend TAPP with choice sequences and study the principle EBIa0. The resulting theories are used to characterise the arithmetical fragment of EL +EBIa0. As a digression, we use TAPP to show that P. Martin-Löf's basic extensional theory ML0 is conservative over intuitionistic arithmetic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Proof-theoretical analysis: weak systems of functions and classes.L. Gordeev - 1988 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 38 (1):1-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Relativized realizability in intuitionistic arithmetic of all finite types.Nicolas D. Goodman - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (1):23-44.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Foundations of Constructive Mathematics. Metamathematical Studies.Michael J. Beeson - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):278-279.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • A semantical proof of De Jongh's theorem.Jaap van Oosten - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (2):105-114.
    In 1969, De Jongh proved the “maximality” of a fragment of intuitionistic predicate calculus forHA. Leivant strengthened the theorem in 1975, using proof-theoretical tools (normalisation of infinitary sequent calculi). By a refinement of De Jongh's original method (using Beth models instead of Kripke models and sheafs of partial combinatory algebras), a semantical proof is given of a result that is almost as good as Leivant's. Furthermore, it is shown thatHA can be extended to Higher Order Heyting Arithmetic+all trueΠ 2 0 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations