Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Middle Knowledge.William Hasker - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):223-236.
    This paper carries forward the discussion initiated by the publication in 1986 of “A Refutation of Middle Knowledge.” Answers are given to two objections that have been raised against the original argument. Next, an alternative argument by Robert Adams is discussed; this argument has the advantage of avoiding reliance on one of the most controversial premises of the original argument. Finally, a definition is given for “S brings it about that Y,” and this definition is used to construct a proof (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Middle Knowledge.William Hasker - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):223-236.
    This paper carries forward the discussion initiated by the publication in 1986 of “A Refutation of Middle Knowledge.” Answers are given to two objections that have been raised against the original argument. Next, an alternative argument by Robert Adams is discussed; this argument has the advantage of avoiding reliance on one of the most controversial premises of the original argument. Finally, a definition is given for “S brings it about that Y,” and this definition is used to construct a proof (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Robert Adams’s New Anti-Molinist Argument.William Lane Craig - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):857-861.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Hasker on divine knowledge.William Lane Craig - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (2):89 - 110.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An anti-molinist argument.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1991 - Philosophical Perspectives 5:343-353.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations