Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Nonseparability and quantum chaos.Frederick M. Kronz - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):50-75.
    Conventional wisdom has it that chaotic behavior is either strongly suppressed or absent in quantum models. Indeed, some researchers have concluded that these considerations serve to undermine the correspondence principle, thereby raising serious doubts about the adequacy of quantum mechanics. Thus, the quantum chaos question is a prime subject for philosophical analysis. The most significant reasons given for the absence or suppression of chaotic behavior in quantum models are the linearity of Schrödinger’s equation and the unitarity of the time-evolution described (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony.James T. Cushing - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):250-252.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   74 citations  
  • Pluralistic ontology and theory reduction in the physical sciences.Fritz Rohrlich - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):295-312.
    It is demonstrated that the reduction of a physical theory S to another one, T, in the sense that S can be derived from T holds in general only for the mathematical framework. The interpretation of S and the associated central terms cannot all be derived from those of T because of the qualitative differences between the cognitive levels of S and T. Their cognitively autonomous status leads to an epistemic as well as an ontological pluralism. This pluralism is consistent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Quantum theory and explanatory discourse: Endgame for understanding?James T. Cushing - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):337-358.
    Empirical adequacy, formal explanation and understanding are distinct goals of science. While no a priori criterion for understanding should be laid down, there may be inherent limitations on the way we are able to understand explanations of physical phenomena. I examine several recent contributions to the exercise of fashioning an explanatory discourse to mold the formal explanation provided by quantum mechanics to our modes of understanding. The question is whether we are capable of truly understanding (or comprehending) quantum phenomena, as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Chaos, quantization, and the correspondence principle.Robert W. Batterman - 1991 - Synthese 89 (2):189 - 227.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Unpredictability, information, and chaos.Carlton M. Caves & R.�Diger Schack - 1997 - Complexity 3 (1):46-57.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations