Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Critique of Principlism.K. D. Clouser & B. Gert - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):219-236.
    The authors use the term “principlism” to refer to the practice of using “principles” to replace both moral theory and particular moral rules and ideals in dealing with the moral problems that arise in medical practice. The authors argue that these “principles” do not function as claimed, and that their use is misleading both practically and theoretically. The “principles” are in fact not guides to action, but rather they are merely names for a collection of sometimes superficially related matters for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  • Principlism’s Balancing Act: Why the Principles of Biomedical Ethics Need a Theory of the Good.Matthew Shea - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):441-470.
    Principlism, the bioethical theory championed by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, is centered on the four moral principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Two key processes related to these principles are specification—adding specific content to general principles—and balancing—determining the relative weight of conflicting principles. I argue that both of these processes necessarily involve an appeal to human goods and evils, and therefore require a theory of the good. A significant problem with principlism is that it lacks a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Dilemmas in Dual Disease: Complexity and Futility in Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis and Substance Use Disorder.James N. Kirkpatrick & Jason W. Smith - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):76-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Debating Medical Utility, Not Futility: Ethical Dilemmas in Treating Critically Ill People Who Use Injection Drugs.Stephen R. Baldassarri, Ike Lee, Stephen R. Latham & Gail D'Onofrio - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):241-251.
    Physicians who care for critically ill people with opioid use disorder frequently face medical, legal, and ethical questions related to the provision of life-saving medical care. We examine a complex medical case that illustrates these challenges in a person with relapsing injection drug use. We focus on a specific question: Is futility an appropriate and useful standard by which to determine provision of life-saving care to such individuals? If so, how should such determinations be made? If not, what alternative decisionmaking (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Does Blame Trump Benefit in Treatment Decisions? Nonadherence and Cardiac Surgery.Ruchika Mishra - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):81-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Generalization of Expertise.Robert M. Veatch - 1973 - The Hastings Center Studies 1 (2):29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • An Ethical Bone to PICC: Considering a Harm Reduction Approach for a Second Valve Replacement for a Person Who Uses Drugs.Daniel Z. Buchman & Marie-Josee Lynch - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):79-81.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations