Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Lower Bounds to the size of constant-depth propositional proofs.Jan Krajíček - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):73-86.
    LK is a natural modification of Gentzen sequent calculus for propositional logic with connectives ¬ and $\bigwedge, \bigvee$. Then for every d ≥ 0 and n ≥ 2, there is a set Td n of depth d sequents of total size O which are refutable in LK by depth d + 1 proof of size exp) but such that every depth d refutation must have the size at least exp). The sets Td n express a weaker form of the pigeonhole (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • The limits of tractability in Resolution-based propositional proof systems.Stefan Dantchev & Barnaby Martin - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (6):656-668.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Separation results for the size of constant-depth propositional proofs.Arnold Beckmann & Samuel R. Buss - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 136 (1-2):30-55.
    This paper proves exponential separations between depth d-LK and depth -LK for every utilizing the order induction principle. As a consequence, we obtain an exponential separation between depth d-LK and depth -LK for . We investigate the relationship between the sequence-size, tree-size and height of depth d-LK-derivations for , and describe transformations between them. We define a general method to lift principles requiring exponential tree-size -LK-refutations for to principles requiring exponential sequence-size d-LK-refutations, which will be described for the Ramsey principle (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations