Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study.Peter Williams & Elizabeth Wager - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):1-11.
    Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals’ policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Pay Walled Retraction Notices.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2015 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):27-39.
    A retraction of a scientific paper is made, most often due to errors or lack of publishing ethics on the part of authors, or, on occasion, duplicate publication by a publisher in error. The retraction notice that accompanies the retraction is an extremely important document, because it is the only information that provides a background to the public regarding the reason why the manuscript was retracted. In most cases, if the retraction notice is truly transparent, it will contain a few (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Author Guidelines.[author unknown] - 2017 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (1):139-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Importance of Retractions and the Need to Correct the Downstream Literature.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2015 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 29 (2).
    Keywords: accountability—corrigendum—erratum—ethics—retraction The past three to four years has seen—as far as can be perceived—what appears to be an increase in retractions, possibly due to an increase in awareness. This awareness relates to the issues underlying science publishing, whether these involve authorship issues, publisher-related ethics, or what appears to be an explosion in open access journals, which is making more science more visible to a wider audience. This aspect in itself is an extremely positive development, and we have only to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations