Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Making sense of age-group justice.Juliana Bidadanure - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (3):234-260.
    This article brings together two debates in contemporary political philosophy: on the one hand, the dispute between the distributive and relational approaches to equality and, on the other hand, the field of intergenerational equality. I offer an original contribution to the second domain and by doing so, I inform the first. The aim of this article is thus twofold: (1) shedding some light on an under-researched and yet crucial question – ‘which inequalities between generations matter?’ and (2) contributing to a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • Health-care needs and distributive justice.Norman Daniels - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (2):146-179.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   58 citations  
  • Priority to the Worse Off in Health Care Resource Prioritization.Dan Brock - 2002 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Margaret P. Battin & Anita Silvers (eds.), Medicine and Social Justice:Essays on the Distribution of Health Care: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. Oup Usa. pp. 373-389.
    This chapter examines whether an individual’s being worse off than others should be a relevant consideration in the allocation of limited medical resources. It reviews arguments pressed by proponents of different theories of justice about whether being worse off than others makes special demands on health care resource prioritization. Even if there is good reason to restrict the concern for the worse off to those with worse health in the prioritization and allocation of health care resources, additional issues remain. One (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Is Age Special? Justice, Complete Lives and the Prudential Lifespan Account.Hugh Lazenby - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):327-340.
    This article explores the problem of justice between age-groups. Specifically, it presents a challenge to a leading theory in this field, Norman Daniels' Prudential Lifespan Account. The challenge relates to a key assumption that underlies this theory, namely the assumption that all individuals live complete lives of equal length. Having identified the roles that this assumption plays, the article argues that the justifications Daniels offers for it are unsatisfactory and that this threatens the foundation of his position, undermining his claim (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Justice between adjacent generations: Further thoughts.Norman Daniels - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4):475-494.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • In Defense of the PLA.Juliana Bidadanure - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8):25-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Justice in health care.Norman Daniels - 2002 - In Ruth F. Chadwick & Doris Schroeder (eds.), Applied ethics: critical concepts in philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 1--69.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Justice between Age‐groups: a comment on Norman Daniels.Dennis Mckerlie - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (2):227-234.
    ABSTRACT Norman Daniels suggests that the just distribution of resources between different age‐groups is determined by the choice a prudential agent would make in budgeting resources over the different temporal stages of a single life. He calls this view the “prudential lifespan account” of justice between age‐groups. Daniels thinks that the view recommends a rough kind of equality in resources between age‐groups. I argue that in the case of a single life prudence would choose an unequal distribution of resources. Consequently, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations