Switch to: Citations

References in:

Entailments are Cancellable

Ratio 30 (3):288-304 (2017)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them).Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):170-185.
    In everyday conversations we often convey information that goes above and beyond what we strictly speaking say: exaggeration and irony are obvious examples. H.P. Grice introduced the technical notion of a conversational implicature in systematizing the phenomenon of meaning one thing by saying something else. In introducing the notion, Grice drew a line between what is said, which he understood as being closely related to the conventional meaning of the words uttered, and what is conversationally implicated, which can be inferred (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • On What Is Strictly Speaking True.Charles Travis - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):187 - 229.
    Let us begin with a piece of intellectual history. The story begins in a period encapsulating the second world war – say the ‘40’s, give and take a bit. Around then, it began to be argued with force that an expression – e.g., an English one – while it well might mean something, does not say anything, and notably no one thing in particular. The principal behind the argument was surely J.L. Austin, though, I would claim, the same point was (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   103 citations  
  • Explicatures Are NOT Cancellable.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics. Springer. pp. 131-151.
    Explicatures are not cancellable. Theoretical considerations.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Implicature, Inference and Cancellability.Michael Haugh - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy. New York, USA: Springer International Publishing. pp. 133-151.
    The standard position in pragmatics to date has been that cancellability is useful way of differentiating implicatures from logical implications, semantic entailments and the like. In recent years, however, there has been considerable debate as to whether implicatures are in fact always cancellable, or indeed whether they are cancellable at all, amongst linguistic pragmaticians and language philosophers. In this chapter, it is suggested that cancellability encompasses a range of actions that play out in different ways depending on whether we are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Conversational Implicature and the Cancellability Test.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2008 - Analysis 68 (2):156-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.Patrick Rysiew - 2001 - Noûs 35 (4):477–514.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   185 citations  
  • Truth.J. L. Austin - 1950 - Aristotelian Society Supp 24 (1):111--29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   118 citations