Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):299-328.
    Virtually every infant in the United States (U.S.) undergoes a heel stick within the first week of life to test for a variety of metabolic, endocrine, and hematological conditions as part of state-run universal newborn screening (NBS) programs. In the U.S., NBS began in the 1960s for phenylketonuria (PKU), a metabolic condition that causes intellectual disability if left untreated. I review the history of how NBS came to be a mandatory public health program that did not require parental consent1 and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Confronting physician assisted suicide and euthanasia: My father's death.Susan M. Wolf - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (5):pp. 23-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening.Stuart G. Nicholls - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):299-303.
    Newborn screening is the programme through which newborn babies are screened for a variety of conditions shortly after birth. Programmes such as this are individually oriented but resemble traditional public health programmes because they are targeted at large groups of the population and they are offered as preventive interventions to a population considered healthy. As such, an ethical tension exists between the goals of promoting the high uptake of supposedly ‘effective’ population-oriented programmes and the goal of promoting genuinely informed decision-making. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Single Payer Meets Managed Competition.David DeGrazia - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 38 (1):23-33.
    Common sense and empirical evidence suggest that single-payer health insurance, combined with competitive private delivery, would be the most cost-effective way of achieving the major, widely accepted goals of health care reform. Among the current presidential candidates, Kucinich and Gravel have the most promising reform proposals, with Edwards’s and Obama’s as fall-backs.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations