Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Symplectic Camel and the Uncertainty Principle: The Tip of an Iceberg? [REVIEW]Maurice A. de Gosson - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (2):194-214.
    We show that the strong form of Heisenberg’s inequalities due to Robertson and Schrödinger can be formally derived using only classical considerations. This is achieved using a statistical tool known as the “minimum volume ellipsoid” together with the notion of symplectic capacity, which we view as a topological measure of uncertainty invariant under Hamiltonian dynamics. This invariant provides a right measurement tool to define what “quantum scale” is. We take the opportunity to discuss the principle of the symplectic camel, which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Pure Quantum Interpretations Are not Viable.I. Schmelzer - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (2):159-177.
    Pure interpretations of quantum theory, which throw away the classical part of the Copenhagen interpretation without adding new structure to its quantum part, are not viable. This is a consequence of a non-uniqueness result for the canonical operators.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Why the Hamilton Operator Alone Is not Enough.I. Schmelzer - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (5):486-498.
    In the many worlds community there seems to exist a belief that the physics of quantum theory is completely defined by it’s Hamilton operator given in an abstract Hilbert space, especially that the position basis may be derived from it as preferred using decoherence techniques.We show, by an explicit example of non-uniqueness, taken from the theory of the KdV equation, that the Hamilton operator alone is not sufficient to fix the physics. We need the canonical operators $\hat{p}$ , $\hat{q}$ as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations