Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct.Archie B. Carroll - 1999 - Business and Society 38 (3):268-295.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   402 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Does Philanthropy Begin at Home? The Strategic Motivations Underlying Corporate Giving Programs.David Saiia, Archie B. Carroll & Ann K. Buchholtz - 2003 - Business and Society 42 (2):169-201.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Review of Amitai Etzioni: The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics[REVIEW]Hamish Stewart - 1990 - Ethics 101 (1):205-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   123 citations  
  • Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach.Mark S. Schwartz & Archie B. Carroll - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):503-530.
    Abstract:Extrapolating from Carroll’s four domains of corporate social responsibility (1979) and Pyramid of CSR (1991), an alternative approach to conceptualizing corporate social responsibility (CSR) is proposed. A three-domain approach is presented in which the three core domains of economic, legal, and ethical responsibilities are depicted in a Venn model framework. The Venn framework yields seven CSR categories resulting from the overlap of the three core domains. Corporate examples are suggested and classified according to the new model, followed by a discussion (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   127 citations  
  • (1 other version)Shareholders versus stakeholders: Corporate mission statements and investor returns.Mohammed Omran, Peter Atrill & John Pointon - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (4):318–326.
    This paper seeks to discover whether companies that adopt a stakeholder approach, and thereby demonstrate a wider remit of corporate responsibility, provide inferior returns to those that embrace the shareholder value approach. To classify approaches, mission statements were analysed, the final sample comprising 32 shareholder oriented companies and 48 stakeholder oriented companies. To assess performance both accounting–based and market–based measures were used. A number of moderating variables were taken into account: systematic (beta) risk, gearing (long–term debt to total long–term finance), (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)Shareholders versus stakeholders: corporate mission statements and investor returns.Mohammed Omran, Peter Atrill & John Pointon - 2002 - Business Ethics: A European Review 11 (4):318-326.
    This paper seeks to discover whether companies that adopt a stakeholder approach, and thereby demonstrate a wider remit of corporate responsibility, provide inferior returns to those that embrace the shareholder value approach. To classify approaches, mission statements were analysed, the final sample comprising 32 shareholder oriented companies and 48 stakeholder oriented companies. To assess performance both accounting–based and market–based measures were used. A number of moderating variables were taken into account: systematic (beta) risk, gearing (long–term debt to total long–term finance), (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Achieving quality in social reporting: The role of surveys in stakeholder consultation.Charles Jackson & Torben Bundgard - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (3):253–259.
    More companies are publishing environmental and social reports, but concerns remain about the extent to which these reports reflect a genuine intention of businesses to make themselves accountable for their social and environmental performance or whether they are merely a way of maintaining corporate reputation in the face of external criticism. Dialogue with stakeholders lies at the heart of Corporate Social Responsibility practice. While questionnaire surveys are a main method for consulting large stakeholder groups, little has been written about how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (2 other versions)Achieving quality in social reporting: the role of surveys in stakeholder consultation.Charles Jackson & Torben Bundgard - 2002 - Business Ethics: A European Review 11 (3):253-259.
    More companies are publishing environmental and social reports, but concerns remain about the extent to which these reports reflect a genuine intention of businesses to make themselves accountable for their social and environmental performance or whether they are merely a way of maintaining corporate reputation in the face of external criticism. Dialogue with stakeholders lies at the heart of Corporate Social Responsibility practice. While questionnaire surveys are a main method for consulting large stakeholder groups, little has been written about how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Measuring corporate performance by building on the stakeholders model of business ethics.M. Joseph Sirgy - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):143 - 162.
    The main thesis guiding the conceptual development of our corporate performance measurement model is that business success – defined as long-term survival and growth – is determined by relationship quality (1) among the various organizational departments (internal stakeholders), (2) between internal and external stakeholders, and (3) between internal and distal stakeholders. Relationship quality among internal stakeholders is conceptualized and operationalized in terms of internal service quality. Relationship quality between internal and external stakeholders is conceptualized and operationalized in terms of external (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • The hunt–vitell general theoryof marketing ethics: Can it enhance our understanding of principal-agent relationships in channels of distribution? [REVIEW]Leslie J. Vermillion, Walfried M. Lassar & Robert D. Winsor - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 41 (3):267 - 285.
    This paper advances the Hunt–Vitell General Theory of Marketing Ethics as a framework for enriching current understanding of both long-term marketing relationships in general, and principal-agent associations specifically. Under economic models of agency theory, manufacturer-distributor relationships are conceptualized as principal-agent associations where both parties are assumed be motivated exclusively by short-term financial self-interest within the logical constraints of zero-sum game conditions. As a general model of ethical decision making and behavior in marketing, the Hunt–Vitell theory illustrates how ethical decisions are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations