Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials.W. A. Silverman - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):6-11.
    Until about thirty years ago, the extent of disclosure about and consent-seeking for medical interventions was influenced by a beneficence model of professional behaviour. Informed consent shifted attention to a duty to respect the autonomy of patients. The new requirement arrived on the American scene in two separate contexts: for daily practice in 1957, and for clinical study in 1966. A confusing double standard has been established. 'Daily consent' is reviewed, if at all, only in retrospect. Doctors are merely exhorted (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?S. Hewlett - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (4):232-237.
    In clinical research the giving of consent by the patient often lies within the context of illness or the doctor/patient relationship. On exploration of these issues it would appear unlikely that the patient's consent is free of substantial influences, some of which may be strong enough to be controlling. Five categories of consent are suggested: voluntary, involuntary, coerced, enforced and partially voluntary. It is argued that consent in clinical research is substantially influenced and thus only partially voluntary. Several practical strategies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations