Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: Conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless.Eric T. Juengst - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):183-200.
    : Some argue that human groups have a stake in the outcome of population-genomics research and that the decision to participate in such research should therefore be subject to group permission. It is not possible, however, to obtain prior group permission, because the actual human groups under study, human demes, are unidentifiable before research begins. Moreover, they lack moral standing. If identifiable social groups with moral standing are used as proxies for demes, group approval could be sought, but at the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)Protecting Communities in Research: Current Guidelines and Limits of Extrapolation.Charles Weijer, Gary Goldsand & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - unknown
    As genetic research increasingly focuses on communities, there have been calls for extending research protections to them. We critically examine guidelines developed to protect aboriginal communities and consider their applicability to other communities. These guidelines are based on a model of researcher-community partnership and span the phases of a research project, from protocol development to publication. The complete list of 23 protections may apply to those few non-aboriginal communities, such as the Amish, that are highly cohesive. Although some protections may (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The responsibilities of scientists.Henk Verhoog - 1981 - Minerva 19 (4):582-604.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations