Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
    This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1712 citations  
  • Epistemic constraints on practical normativity.Simon Robertson - 2011 - Synthese 181 (S1):81-106.
    What is the relation between what we ought to do, on the one hand, and our epistemic access to the ought-giving facts, on the other? In assessing this,it is common to distinguish ‘objective’ from ‘subjective’ oughts. Very roughly, on the objectivist conception what an agent ought to do is determined by ought-giving facts in such a way that does not depend on the agent’s beliefs about, or epistemic access to, those facts; whereas on the subjectivist conception, what an agent ought (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Climbing: Because It's There – Stephen E. Schmid.Dudley Knowles - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):887-890.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Nature and risk in adventure sports.Kevin Krein - 2007 - In Mike J. McNamee (ed.), Philosophy, Risk and Adventure Sports. London ;Routledge. pp. 80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations