Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Plato and Aristotle in agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry.George E. Karamanolis - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    George Karamanolis breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the first century BC to the third century AD. Arguing against prevailing scholarly assumption, he argues that the Platonists turned to Aristotle only in order to elucidate Plato's doctrines and to reconstruct Plato's philosophy, and that they did not hesitate to criticize Aristotle when judging him to be at odds with Plato. Karamanolis offers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  • Animal minds.Richard Sorabji - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (S1):1-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Porphyry's Introduction.Jonathan Barnes (ed.) - 2003 - Clarendon Press.
    The Introduction to philosophy written by Porphyry at the end of the second century AD is the most successful work of its kind ever to have been published. Porphyry's aim was modest, but he gave highly influential treatments of a number of perennial philosophical questions. Jonathan Barnes presents a complete new English translation, preceded by a substantial introduction and followed by an invaluable commentary, the first to be published in English and the fullest for a century, whose primary aim is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Dumb beasts and dead philosophers: humanity and the humane in ancient philosophy and literature.Catherine Osborne - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    The book is about three things. First, how Ancient thinkers perceived humans as like or unlike other animals; second about the justification for taking a humane attitude towards natural things; and third about how moral claims count as true, and how they can be discovered or acquired. Was Aristotle was right to see continuity in the psychological functions of animal and human souls? The question cannot be settled without taking a moral stance. As we can either focus on continuity or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate.Richard Sorabji - 1993 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
    Sorabji surveys a vast range of Greek philosophical texts and considers how classical discussions of animals' capacities intersect with central questions, not only in ethics but in the definition of human rationality as well.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • Porphyrian Studies Since 1913.Andrew Smith - 1987 - In Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie. De Gruyter. pp. 717-773.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Animal minds and human morals. The origins of the Western debate.Richard Sorabji - 1993 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 186 (2):293-294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  • What Is Prophyry's Isagoge?Riccardo Chiaradonna - 2008 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 19:1-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Kontroversen um die Seelenwanderung im kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus.Heinrich Dörrie - 1957 - Hermes 85 (4):414-435.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations