Switch to: Citations

References in:

What Caused the Big Bang?

Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi (2001)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The doctrine of creation and modern science.Wolfhart Pannenberg - 1988 - Zygon 23 (1):3-21.
    In contrast to Christian theology that has ignored science, this essay suggests that a credible doctrine of God as creator must take into account scientific understandings of the world. The introduction of the principle of inertia into seventeenth‐century science and philosophy helped change the traditional idea of God as creator (which included divine conservation and governance) into a deist concept of God. To recapture the idea that God continually creates, it is important to affirm the contingency of the world as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The new evolutionary ethics.Michael Ruse - 1993 - In Matthew H. Nitecki & Doris V. Nitecki (eds.), Evolutionary Ethics. SUNY Press. pp. 133-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Barrow and Tipler's anthropic cosmological principle.Fred W. Hallberg - 1988 - Zygon 23 (2):139-157.
    John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler's recently published Anthropic Cosmological Principle is an encyclopedic defense of melioristic evolutionary cosmology. They review the history of the idea from ancient times to the present, and defend both a “weak” version, and two “strong” versions of the anthropic principle. I argue the weak version of the anthropic principle is true and important, but that neither of the two strong versions are well grounded in fact. Their “final” anthropic principle is a revision of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Christianity and evolutionary ethics: Sketch toward a reconciliation.Patricia A. Williams - 1996 - Zygon 31 (2):253-268.
    Evolutionary ethics posits the evolution of dispositions to love self, kin, and friend. Christianity claims that God's ethical demand is to love one's neighbor. I argue that the distance between these two positions can be interpreted theologically as original sin, the disposition to disobey God's command and practice self-love and nepotism rather than neighbor-love. Original sin requires Incarnation and Atonement to unite God and humanity. The ancient doctrine of the Atonement as educative does not invoke the Fall. Its revival may (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Events and processes in the quantum world.Abner Shimony - 1986 - In Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.), Quantum concepts in space and time. New York ;: Oxford University Press. pp. 182--203.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  • (1 other version)”Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics.Hugh Everett - 1957 - Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (3):454--462.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   296 citations  
  • Self Reliance.Ralph Waldo Emerson - 1841 - In Ralph Waldo Emerson, Essays.
    This is Emerson's classic statement of intellectual and moral independence.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • Science and God the creator.Arthur Peacocke - 1993 - Zygon 28 (4):469-484.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • God and Process.Rem B. Edwards - 1992 - In James Franklin Harris & Bowman L. Clarke (eds.), Logic, God and Metaphysics. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 41-57.
    This article argues against Bowman Clarke's attempt to eliminate futurity from the God of Process.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Quantum physics and the philosophy of Whitehead.Abner Shimony - 1964 - In Max Black (ed.), Philosophy in America. Ithaca: Routledge. pp. 240--261.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Does naturalism need ontology?Roy Wood Sellars - 1944 - Journal of Philosophy 41 (25):686-694.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (7 other versions)Philosophical Naturalism.Michael Friedman - 1997 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71 (2):5 - 21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • The omega point as eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's questions for scientists.Frank J. Tipler - 1989 - Zygon 24 (2):217-253.
    I present an outline of the Omega Point theory, which is a model for an omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent, evolving, personal God who is both transcendent to spacetime and immanent in it, and who exists necessarily. The model is a falsifiable physical theory, deriving its key concepts not from any religious tradition but from modern physical cosmology and computer science; from scientific materialism rather than revelation. Four testable predictions of the model are given. The theory assumes that thinking is a purely (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Big Bangs, Black Holes and Time's Arrow.Roger Penrose - 1986 - In Raymond Flood & Michael Lockwood (eds.), The Nature of time. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • How many worlds?Richard A. Healey - 1984 - Noûs 18 (4):591-616.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • An Alternative to Creatio ex nihilo.Lewis S. Ford - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (2):205 - 213.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)Causal Efficacy.[author unknown] - 1987 - Process Studies 16 (2):126-139.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • The natural God: A God even an atheist can believe in.Joel I. Friedman - 1986 - Zygon 21 (3):369-388.
    . In this paper, I attempt to dissolve the theism/atheism boundary. In the first part, I consider last things, according to mainstream science. In the second part, I define the Natural God as the Force of Nature—evolving, unifying, maximizing—and consider Its relation to last things. Finally, I discuss our knowledge of the Natural God and Its relevance to our personal lives. I argue that we can know the Natural God through scientific reason combined with global intuition, and that this knowledge, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation