Switch to: Citations

References in:

Alvin Plantinga's warranted Christian belief

Noûs 37 (2):353–370 (2003)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
    This is the third volume in Alvin Plantinga's trilogy on the notion of warrant, which he defines as that which distinguishes knowledge from true belief. In this volume, Plantinga examines warrant's role in theistic belief, tackling the questions of whether it is rational, reasonable, justifiable, and warranted to accept Christian belief and whether there is something epistemically unacceptable in doing so. He contends that Christian beliefs are warranted to the extent that they are formed by properly functioning cognitive faculties, thus, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   313 citations  
  • (1 other version)Warrant and proper function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    In this companion volume to Warrant: The Current Debate, Plantinga develops an original approach to the question of epistemic warrant; that is what turns true belief into knowledge. He argues that what is crucial to warrant is the proper functioning of one's cognitive faculties in the right kind of cognitive environment.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   593 citations  
  • Plantinga's case against naturalistic epistemology.Evan Fales - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):432-451.
    In Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga claims that metaphysical naturalism, when joined to a naturalized epistemology, is self-undermining. Plantinga argues that naturalists are committed to a neoDarwinian account of our origins, and that the reliability of our cognitive faculties is improbable or unknown relative to that theory. If the theory is true, then we are in no position to know that, whereas theism, if true, underwrites cognitive reliability. I seek to turn the tables on Plantinga, showing that neoDarwinism provides (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)A Defense of the Given.Evan Fales - 2000 - Noûs 34 (3):468-480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • (1 other version)A Defense of the Given.Michael Huemer & Evan Fales - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):128.
    The “doctrine of the given” that Fales defends holds that there are certain experiences such that we can have justified beliefs about their “contents” that are not based on any other beliefs, and that the rest of our justified empirical beliefs rest on those “basic beliefs.” The features of experience basic beliefs are about are said to be “given.” Fales holds that some basic beliefs are infallible, having a kind of clarity that guarantees their truth to the believer. In addition, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • A Defense of the Given.Evan Fales - 1996 - Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
    The Doctrine of the Given The Myth of the Given A Methodological Problem To a convinced foundationalist, the project of establishing the existence of the ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • (1 other version)Warranted Christian Belief.P. Helm - 2001 - Mind 110 (440):1110-1115.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   160 citations