Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time.Huw Price - 1996 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
    Why is the future so different from the past? Why does the past affect the future and not the other way round? The universe began with the Big Bang - will it end with a `Big Crunch'? Now in paperback, this book presents an innovative and controversial view of time and contemporary physics. Price urges physicists, philosophers, and anyone who has ever pondered the paradoxes of time to look at the world from a fresh perspective, and throws fascinating new light (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   182 citations  
  • Philosophical Foundations of Physics;.Rudolf Carnap - 1966 - New York: Basic Books.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   166 citations  
  • Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point.Huw Price - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1093-1096.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   308 citations  
  • Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time.Huw Price - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):135-159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   174 citations  
  • Philosophical Foundations of Physics. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science.Rudolf Carnap & Martin Gardner - 1966 - Synthese 17 (1):366-367.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   132 citations  
  • Becoming and the arrow of causation.Mauro Dorato - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):534.
    The conceptual relation between objective becoming and the direction of time is explored by discussing an ontologically asymmetric notion of causation. It is claimed that such a notion, in terms of which Stein defined objective becoming in Minkowski spacetime, has either a purely metaphysical status or is reducible to physical concepts. In the former case, it is adequate for Stein's purpose but irrelevant to physical theories. In the latter, the causal asymmetry can be related to irreversible physical processes only in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations