Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Research ethics: Performance-based readability testing of participant materials for a phase I trial: TGN1412.P. Knapp, D. K. Raynor, J. Silcock & B. Parkinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9):573-578.
    Background: Concern has been expressed about the process of consent to clinical trials, particularly in phase I “first-in-man” trials. Trial participant information sheets are often lengthy and technical. Content-based readability testing of sheets, which is often required to obtain research ethics approval for trials in the USA, is limited and cannot indicate how information will perform. Methods: An independent-groups design was used to study the user-testing performance of the participant information sheet from the phase I TGN1412 trial. Members of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Enhancing Comprehension of Information for Informed Consent: A Review of Empirical Research. [REVIEW]Mary Cipriano Silva & Jeanne Merckle Sorrell - 1988 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 10 (1):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Improving Informed Consent: A Comparison of Four Consent Tools.Patricia Agre & Bruce Rapkin - 2003 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (6):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Do Research Intermediaries Reduce Perceived Coercion to Enter Research Trials Among Criminally Involved Substance Abusers?David S. Festinger, Karen L. Dugosh, Jason R. Croft, Patricia L. Arabia & Douglas B. Marlowe - 2011 - Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):252 - 259.
    We examined the efficacy of including a research intermediary (RI) during the consent process in reducing participants' perceptions of coercion to enroll in a research study. Eighty-four drug court clients being recruited into an ongoing study were randomized to receive a standard informed consent process alone (standard condition) or with an RI (intermediary condition). Before obtaining consent, RIs met with clients individually to discuss remaining concerns. Findings provided preliminary evidence that RIs reduced client perceptions that their participation might influence how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Corrected Feedback: A Procedure to Enhance Recall of Informed Consent to Research Among Substance Abusing Offenders.Douglas B. Marlowe, Jason R. Croft, Karen L. Dugosh, David S. Festinger & Patricia L. Arabia - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (5):387-399.
    This study examined the efficacy of corrected feedback for improving consent recall throughout the course of an ongoing longitudinal study. Participants were randomly assigned to either a corrected feedback or a no-feedback control condition. Participants completed a consent quiz 2 weeks after consenting to the host study and at months 1, 2, and 3. The corrected feedback group received corrections to erroneous responses and the no-feedback control group did not. The feedback group displayed significantly greater recall overall and in specific (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Informed consent and patient's rights documents: A right, a rite, or a rewrite?Mark Hochhauser - 1999 - Ethics and Behavior 9 (1):1 – 20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Neuropsychological functioning and recall of research consent information among drug court clients.David S. Festinger, Kattiya Ratanadilok, Douglas B. Marlowe, Karen L. Dugosh, Nicholas S. Patapis & David S. DeMatteo - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (2):163 – 186.
    Evidence suggests that research participants often fail to recall much of the information provided during the informed consent process. This study was conducted to determine the proportion of consent information recalled by drug court participants following a structured informed consent procedure and the neuropsychological factors that were related to recall. Eighty-five participants completed a standard informed consent procedure to participate in an ongoing research study, followed by a 17-item consent quiz and a brief neuropsychological battery 2 weeks later. Participants performed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations