Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage?R. Bennett - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):446-448.
    This paper considers the ethics of routine antenatal HIV testing and the role of informed consent within such a policy in order to decide how we should proceed in this area—a decision that ultimately rests on the relative importance we give to public health goals on the one hand and respect for individual autonomy on the other.A recent illuminating qualitative study by Zulueta and Boulton1 explores the practicalities of informed consent in routine antenatal HIV testing. Its results support what I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights.United Nations - 1948 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 21 (1-2):153-160.
    On 10 December 1948, the General Assembly ofthe United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a truly historic document, the full text of which is reproduced here. Following this historic act, the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories." Jacques Maritain was (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   257 citations  
  • Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
    Book reviewed in this article: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. By Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2265 citations  
  • Routine antenatal HIV testing: the responses and perceptions of pregnant women and the viability of informed consent. A qualitative study.P. de Zulueta & M. Boulton - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):329-336.
    This qualitative cross-sectional survey, undertaken in the antenatal booking clinics of a hospital in central London, explores pregnant women’s responses to routine HIV testing, examines their reasons for declining or accepting the test, and assesses how far their responses fulfil standard criteria for informed consent. Of the 32 women interviewed, only 10 participants were prepared for HIV testing at their booking interview. None of the women viewed themselves as being particularly at risk for HIV infection. The minority of the participants (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations