Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Surgeons' quest for life: the history and the future of xenotransplantation.Rebecca Malouin - 1993 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 37 (3):416-428.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Animals, Property and the Law.Gary Francione - 1998 - Environmental Values 7 (1):118-120.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism.James RACHELS - 1990 - Environmental Values 1 (1):83-86.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  • Data on animal experimentation in the United States: what they do and do not show.F. Barbara Orlans - 1993 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 37 (2):217-231.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The three rs: A restrictive and refutable rigmarole.H. Lansdell - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (2):177 – 185.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Animal Rights and Human Obligations.Tom Regan & Peter Singer - 1979 - Environmental Ethics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Review of Paul T. Menzel: Strong Medicine: The Ethical Rationing of Health Care.[REVIEW]Mark H. Waymack - 1991 - Ethics 101 (2):417-418.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Animal models in biomedical research: Some epistemological worries.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1993 - Public Affairs Quarterly 7 (2):113-130.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Biology, Ethics and Animals.R. G. Frey - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):415-417.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Anencephalic Donors: Separate the Dead From the Dying.Alexander Morgan Capron - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (1):5-9.
    Proposals to use organs from anencephalic infants to meet the growing need for transplantable ogans are well‐meaning but misguided. It would be unwise to amend the Uniform Determination of Death Act to classify anencephalics as “dead.” They are in the same situation as other patients (such as the permanently comatose). Likewise, amending the Anatomical Gin Act to permit organs to be removed from anencephalics would be unjust would set a bad precedent and would likely reduce overall success in this field.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Moral Standing of Animals in Medical Research.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):7-16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Special Supplement: The Brave New World of Animal Biotechnology.Strachan Donnelley, Charles R. McCarthy & Rivers Singleton - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (1):1-31.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation