- Appendix.[author unknown] - 1993 - The Personalist Forum 9 (1):53-61.details
|
|
What the tortoise said to Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 4 (14):278-280.details
|
|
What The Tortoise Said To Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 104 (416):691-693.details
|
|
Entailment and Relevance.Nuel D. Belnap - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (1):120-120.details
|
|
Logical Pluralism.J. C. Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.details
|
|
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.details
|
|
Logical pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.details
|
|
A Note on Freedom from Detachment in the Logic of Paradox.Jc Beall, Thomas Forster & Jeremy Seligman - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (1):15-20.details
|
|
The pure calculus of entailment.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (1):19-52.details
|
|
Enthymemes.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (23):713-723.details
|
|
Begründung Einer Strengen Implikation.Wilhelm Ackermann - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):327-328.details
|
|
Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference.Stephen Read - 1988 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.details
|
|
R and Relevance Principle Revisited.Eunsuk Yang - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):767-782.details
|
|
Relevant logic: a philosophical examination of inference.Stephen Read - 1988 - Oxford: Blackwell.details
|
|
Entailment and relevance.Nuel D. Belnap - 1960 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (2):144-146.details
|
|
E, r, and γ.Robert K. Meyer & J. Michael Dunn - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):460-474.details
|
|
E, R and γ.Robert K. Meyer & J. Michael Dunn - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):521-522.details
|
|
Classical relevant logics II.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1974 - Studia Logica 33 (2):183 - 194.details
|
|
The semantics ofr.Edwin D. Mares & Robert K. Meyer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1):95 - 110.details
|
|
The Semantics of R4.Edwin D. Mares & Robert K. Meyer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1):95-110.details
|
|
On the logic of contingent relevant implication: a conceptual incoherence in the intuitive interpretation of ${\rm R}$.Mark Lance - 1988 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (4):520-529.details
|
|
Logical Consequence and the Paradoxes.Edwin Mares & Francesco Paoli - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):439-469.details
|
|
CE is not a conservative extension of E.Edwin D. Mares - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):263-275.details
|
|
Classically complete modal relevant logics.Edwin D. Mares - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):165-177.details
|
|
A plea for KR.Alison Duncan Kerr - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3047-3071.details
|
|
Logical Pluralism, Meaning-Variance, and Verbal Disputes.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):355-373.details
|
|
Completeness and conservative extension results for some Boolean relevant logics.Steve Giambrone & Robert K. Meyer - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (1):1 - 14.details
|
|
Non-Boolean classical relevant logics I.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2019 - Synthese (8):1-32.details
|
|
Skolem Functions in Non-Classical Logics.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (1):181-225.details
|
|
Boolean negation and non-conservativity III: the Ackermann constant.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2021 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 29 (3):370-384.details
|
|
Boolean negation and non-conservativity I: Relevant modal logics.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2021 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 29 (3):340-362.details
|
|
Variations on intra-theoretical logical pluralism: internal versus external consequence.Bogdan Dicher - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):667-686.details
|
|
Residuated Lattices: An Algebraic Glimpse at Substructural Logics.Nikolaos Galatos, Peter Jipsen, Tomasz Kowalski & Hiroakira Ono - 2007 - Elsevier.details
|
|
Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.details
|
|
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - London and New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
A New Introduction to Modal Logic.M. J. Cresswell & G. E. Hughes - 1996 - New York: Routledge. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.details
|
|
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Critica 14 (42):112-119.details
|
|
The Semantic Completeness Of Rk.Edwin Mares - 1992 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:3-10.details
|
|
Smiley's distinction between rules of inference and rules of proof.Lloyd Humberstone - 2010 - In Jonathan Lear & Alex Oliver (eds.), The Force of Argument: Essays in Honor of Timothy Smiley. Routledge. pp. 107--126.details
|
|
Negation in Relevant Logics (How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Routley star).Greg Restall - 1999 - In Dov Gabbay & Heinrich Wansing (eds.), What is Negation? Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 53-76.details
|
|
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Philosophy 56 (217):435-436.details
|
|
The Relevant Logic E and Some Close Neighbours: A Reinterpretation.Edwin Mares & Shawn Standefer - 2017 - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 4 (3):695--730.details
|
|
Über die Beziehung zwischen strikter und strenger Implikation.W. Ackermann - 1958 - Dialectica 12 (3):213.details
|
|