Switch to: Citations

References in:

Commentary on Szasz

Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):230-232 (2003)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Comment on Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [2002] 2 All England Reports 449.M. Stauch - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):232-233.
    The judgment handed down in the case of Ms B confirms the right of the competent patient to refuse medical treatment even if the result is death. The case does, however, raise some interesting legal points. The facility for conscientious objection by doctors has not previously been explicitly recognised in case law. More importantly perhaps is that the detailed inquiry by the court into Ms B’s reasons for refusing treatment, apparently as a precondition for finding her competent, seems to contradict (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B.D. Coleman - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):240-242.
    This article will examine the case of Ms B, a woman with tetraplegia for a year, who, prior to rehabilitation or return to community life, sought a ruling that doctors may turn off her ventilator. The authors are people with disabilities. Their analysis focuses on the manner in which the High Court framed the case in terms of mental capacity, addressed the issue of suicide and ambivalence, and resolved informed consent and treatment alternative issues. While the disability community in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Psychiatry and the control of dangerousness: on the apotropaic function of the term “mental illness”.T. Szasz - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):227-230.
    The term “mental illness” implies that persons with such illnesses are more likely to be dangerous to themselves and/or others than are persons without such illnesses. This is the source of the psychiatrist’s traditional social obligation to control “harm to self and/or others,” that is, suicide and crime. The ethical dilemmas of psychiatry cannot be resolved as long as the contradictory functions of healing persons and protecting society are united in a single discipline.Life is full of dangers. Our highly developed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The case of Ms B: suicide's slippery slope?J. Keown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):238-239.
    In the case of Ms B, the High Court ruled that as Ms B was a competent adult patient, her doctors acted unlawfully in overriding her refusal of life-preserving ventilation. This commentary considers whether this case supports the proposition that in English law the right to refuse treatment extends even to refusals which are clearly suicidal.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations