Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice.Jennifer S. Lerner & Dacher Keltner - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (4):473-493.
    Most theories of affective influences on judgement and choice take a valence-based approach, contrasting the effects of positive versus negative feeling states. These approaches have not specified if and when distinct emotions of the same valence have different effects on judgement. In this article, we propose a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. We posit that each emotion is defined by a tendency to perceive new events and objects in ways that are consistent with the original cognitive-appraisal dimensions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   163 citations  
  • Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition.Joseph P. Forgas (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
    This book reviews and integrates the most recent research and theories on this exciting topic, and features original contributions from leading researchers ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.Antoine Bechara, Antonio R. Damasio, Hanna Damasio & Steven W. Anderson - 1993 - Cognition 50 (1-3):7-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   238 citations  
  • Anger, personality, and optimistic stress appraisals.Scott Hemenover & Shen Zhang - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (3):363-382.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dispositional anger and risk decision-making.Elisa Gambetti & Fiorella Giusberti - 2009 - Mind and Society 8 (1):7-20.
    In this study, we assessed the influence of trait anger on decisions in risky situations evaluating how it might interact with some contextual factors. One hundred and fifty-eight participants completed the Trait Anger scale of STAXI-2 and an inventory consisting of a battery of hypothetical everyday decision-making scenarios, representative of three specific domains: financial, social and health. Participants were also asked to evaluate familiarity and salience for each scenario. This study provides evidence for a relationship between individual differences in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Choices, Values, and Frames.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
    This book presents the definitive exposition of 'prospect theory', a compelling alternative to the classical utility theory of choice. Building on the 1982 volume, Judgement Under Uncertainty, this book brings together seminal papers on prospect theory from economists, decision theorists, and psychologists, including the work of the late Amos Tversky, whose contributions are collected here for the first time. While remaining within a rational choice framework, prospect theory delivers more accurate, empirically verified predictions in key test cases, as well as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   221 citations