Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. When "Minimal Risk" Research Yields Clinically-Significant Data, Maybe the Risks Aren't So Minimal.Helen M. Sharp & Robert D. Orr - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):32-36.
    Surveys and routine clinical procedures applied in research protocols are typically considered only minimally risky to participants. The apparent benign nature of "minimal risk" tasks increases the chance that investigators and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) will overlook the probability that clinical tools will identify signs, symptoms, or definitive test results that are clinically-relevant to subjects' welfare. "Minimal risk" procedures may also pose a particular hazard to participants in clinical research by increasing the therapeutic misconception because the tasks mimic clinical care (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research.Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
    This paper reports data and scholarly opinion that support the perception of systemic flaws in the management of scientific professions and the research enterprise; explores the responsibility that professional status places on the scientific professions, and elaborates the concept of the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Data are presented on research misconduct, availability of research guidelines, and perceived research quality.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations