Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology. [REVIEW]Susanna Hornig Priest & Allen W. Gillespie - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):529-539.
    Survey data are presented on opinions about agricultural biotechnology and its applications held by agricultural science faculty at highly ranked programs in the United States with and without personal involvement in biotechnology-oriented research. Respondents believed biotech holds much promise, but policy positions vary. These results underscore the relationship between opinion and stakeholder interests in this research, even among scientific experts. Media accounts are often seen as causes, rather than artifacts, of the existence of public controversy; European and now U.S. opposition (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Making the audience a key participant in the science communication process.Carol L. Rogers - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):553-557.
    The public communication of science and technology has become increasingly important over the last several decades. However, understanding the audience that receives this information remains the weak link in the science communication process. This essay provides a brief review of some of the issues involved, discusses results from an audience-based study, and suggests some strategies that both scientists and journalists can use to modify media coverage in ways that can help audiences better understand major public issues that involve science and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Talking and teaching about human biological variation: Commentary on “talking about race in a scientific context”.Fatimah Jackson - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):495-497.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Talking about race in a scientific context.Frances S. Chew - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):485-494.
    There are at least two approaches that assist students in understanding complexity and differing interpretations about human diversity and race. Because differing perspectives emerge from data perceived at different levels, different scales provide a tool for understanding relationships among perspectives and understanding the differential importance of specific factors. Constructivist listening, which assists students in examining their own experiences, feelings and understanding, provides a tool for digesting complex new material and learning emotional literacy. It can be applied to dialogue about race (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Talking and teaching about human biological variation.Professor Fatimah Jackson - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):495-497.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations