Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality.Nancy Holmstrom - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (4):583.
    In the first two chapters, Cohen deals with justice, freedom, and equality without mention of self-ownership, offering a devastating critique of the libertarian claim that despite great economic inequality, laissez-faire capitalism is the most just society because it is the most free. The assumption, made by liberals as well as libertarians, that we have to choose between liberty and equality fails to acknowledge that a system based on large-scale private property entails the unfreedom of the majority without property. Cohen shows (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View.Samuel Freeman - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (2):105-151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  • Real World Justice.Thomas Pogge - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):29-53.
    Despite a high and growing global average income, billions of human beings are still condemned to lifelong severe poverty with all its attendant evils of low life expectancy, social exclusion, ill health, illiteracy, dependency, and effective enslavement. We citizens of the rich countries are conditioned to think of this problem as an occasion for assistance. Thanks in part to the rationalizations dispensed by our economists, most of us do not realize how deeply we are implicated, through the new global economic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • Thinking about the Needy: A Reprise.Larry S. Temkin - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (4):409-458.
    This article discusses Jan Narveson's "Welfare and Wealth, Poverty and Justice in Today's World," and "Is World Poverty a Moral Problem for the Wealthy?" and their relation to my "Thinking about the Needy, Justice, and International Organizations." Section 2 points out that Narveson's concerns differ from mine, so that often his claims and mine fail to engage each other. For example, his focus is on the poor, mine the needy, and while many poor are needy, and vice versa, our obligations (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Mediating duties.Henry Shue - 1988 - Ethics 98 (4):687-704.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • Is World Poverty a Moral Problem for the Wealthy?Jan Narveson - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (4):397-408.
    This article discusses the question of poverty and wealth in light of several theses put forward by Larry Temkin. The claim that there is a sort of cosmic injustice involved when great disparities of ability or of wealth are found. He is concerned especially about disparities that are undeserved. It is agreed that this is unfortunate, but not agreed that they are unjust in a sense that supports the imposition of rectification on anyone else. Nor is poverty typically "undeserved" in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations