Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics.Risto Hilpinen (ed.) - 1981 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Wiley-Blackwell.
    The present volume is a sequel to Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings : its purpose is to offer a view of some of the main directions of research in contemporary deontic logic. Most of the articles included in Introductory and Systematic Readings represent what may be called the standard modal approach to deontic logic, in which de on tic logic is treated as a branch of modal logic, and the normative concepts of obligation, permission and prohibition are regarded as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Good samaritans, contrary-to-duty imperatives, and epistemic obligations.Lennart Å Qvist - 1967 - Noûs 1 (4):361-379.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • (4 other versions)Deontic logic.G. H. von Wright - 1951 - Mind 60 (237):1-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   170 citations  
  • Some deontic logicians.Lawrence Powers - 1967 - Noûs 1 (4):381-400.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Opacity and the ought-to-be.Lou Goble - 1973 - Noûs 7 (4):407-412.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Logic of Conditional Obligation.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (3/4):417.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Grades Of Modality.L. F. Goble - 1970 - Logique Et Analyse 13:323-334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Contrary-to-duty imperatives and conditional obligation.James E. Tomberlin - 1981 - Noûs 15 (3):357-375.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • On the semantics and logic of obligation.Frank Jackson - 1985 - Mind 94 (374):177-195.
    This paper develops an informal semantics for 'ought to be' and 'ought to be given...' and argues for its plausibility. A feature of the semantics is that it invalidates 'if a entails b, And o(a), Then o(b)' and 'if o(a) & o(b), Then o(a&b)', While validating detachment for conditional obligation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  • (4 other versions)I. deontic logic.G. H. von Wright - 1951 - Mind 60 (237):1-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   179 citations  
  • The logic of conditional obligation.Bas C. Fraassen - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (3/4):417 - 438.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • On Chisholm's paradox.Peter L. Mott - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (2):197 - 211.
    It has been maintained that we are quite able to express (1*)–(4*) without the introduction of a dyadic deontic operator, provided only that we supply our standard deontic logic with a stronger conditional than material implication. The lesson learned from Chisholm's paradox has been the eminently convincing, indeed obvious, one: that what we ought to do is not determined by what is the case in some perfect world, but by what is the case in the best world we can ‘get (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions.G. H. Von Wright - 1968 - Critica 2 (6):3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • On evaluating deontic logics.Harry beatty - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (3/4):439 - 444.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations