Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Image, music, text.Roland Barthes & Stephen Heath - 1978 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (2):235-236.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   236 citations  
  • (1 other version)Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Mimesis as Make-Believe is important reading for everyone interested in the workings of representational art.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   477 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts.Kendall L. WALTON - 1990 - Philosophy 66 (258):527-529.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   401 citations  
  • Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   766 citations  
  • (1 other version)Validity in interpretation.E. D. Hirsch - 1967 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:493-494.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  • From Prague to Paris: a critique of structuralist and post-structuralist thought.José Guilherme Merquior - 1986 - London: Verso.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Paul Ricoeur: "The Rule of Metaphor". [REVIEW]Harrison Hall - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (1):117-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism.Dan O'Hara & Josue V. Harari - 1981 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1):101-105.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Validity in Interpretation.George Dickie - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (4):550-552.
    By demonstrating the uniformity and universality of the principles of valid interpretation of verbal texts of any sort, this closely reasoned examination provides a theoretical foundation for a discipline that is fundamental to virtually all humanistic studies. It defines the grounds on which textual interpretation can claim to establish objective knowledge, defends that claim against such skeptical attitudes as historicism and psychologism, and shows that many confusions can be avoided if the distinctions between meaning and significance, interpretation and criticism are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations