Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   474 citations  
  • Measuring inconsistency.Kevin Knight - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):77-98.
    I provide a method of measuring the inconsistency of a set of sentences from 1-consistency, corresponding to complete consistency, to 0-consistency, corresponding to the explicit presence of a contradiction. Using this notion to analyze the lottery paradox, one can see that the set of sentences capturing the paradox has a high degree of consistency (assuming, of course, a sufficiently large lottery). The measure of consistency, however, is not limited to paradoxes. I also provide results for general sets of sentences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Classifications for inconsistent theories.John Grant - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):435-444.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Relative inconsistency measures.Philippe Besnard & John Grant - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 280 (C):103231.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations