Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. An argument game for stable semantics.Martin Caminada & Yining Wu - 2008 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 17 (1):77-90.
    In this paper, we present a discussion game for argumentation under stable semantics. Our work is inspired by Vreeswijk and Prakken, who have defined a similar game for preferred semantics. In the current paper, we restate Vreeswijk and Prakken's work using the approach of argument labellings and then show how it can be adjusted for stable semantics. The nature of the resulting argument game is somewhat unusual, since stable semantics does not satisfy the property of relevance.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Modal Logic: Graph. Darst.Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema.
    This modern, advanced textbook reviews modal logic, a field which caught the attention of computer scientists in the late 1970's.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   295 citations  
  • Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction.Johan van Benthem - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This book develops a view of logic as a theory of information-driven agency and intelligent interaction between many agents - with conversation, argumentation and games as guiding examples. It provides one uniform account of dynamic logics for acts of inference, observation, questions and communication, that can handle both update of knowledge and revision of beliefs. It then extends the dynamic style of analysis to include changing preferences and goals, temporal processes, group action and strategic interaction in games. Throughout, the book (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   113 citations  
  • Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
    There was a long tradition in philosophy according to which good reasoning had to be deductively valid. However, that tradition began to be questioned in the 1960’s, and is now thoroughly discredited. What caused its downfall was the recognition that many familiar kinds of reasoning are not deductively valid, but clearly confer justification on their conclusions. Here are some simple examples.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   336 citations  
  • Propositional quantifiers in modal logic.Kit Fine - 1970 - Theoria 36 (3):336-346.
    In this paper I shall present some of the results I have obtained on modal theories which contain quantifiers for propositions. The paper is in two parts: in the first part I consider theories whose non-quantificational part is S5; in the second part I consider theories whose non-quantificational part is weaker than or not contained in S5. Unless otherwise stated, each theory has the same language L. This consists of a countable set V of propositional variables pl, pa, ... , (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   94 citations  
  • Propositional Quantifiers in Modal Logic.Kit Fine - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):329-329.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  • On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   440 citations  
  • Logic in Games.Johan Van Benthem - 2014 - MIT Press.
    A comprehensive examination of the interfaces of logic, computer science, and game theory, drawing on twenty years of research on logic and games.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • Modal Logic.Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema - 2001 - Studia Logica 76 (1):142-148.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   378 citations