Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Reason, relativity, and responsibility in computer ethics.James H. Moor - 1998 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 28 (1):14-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Cyberlibertarian myths and the prospects for community.Langdon Winner - 1997 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):14-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Discourse ethics and civil society.Jean Cohen - 1988 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (3-4):315-337.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (1 other version)Reading Habermas.Georgia Warnke & David M. Rasmussen - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (166):129.
    In the past decade the work of Jurgen Habermas has sparked off a series of lively debates over modernity and post-modernity, the nature of language, the interplay of law and politics and the dilemmas of morality. Significantly, these debates unfold in the context of his particular reading of the modern philosophical tradition from the German enlightment to the present period. In this original interpretation, David Rasmussen provides both guide and critique to the later Habermas encountered in the context of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • If Aristotle were a computing professional.James H. Moor - 1998 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 28 (3):13-16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The practitioner from within: revisiting the virtues.Frances Grodzinsky - 1999 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 29 (1):9-15.
    Traditionally the study of computer ethics involves taking students who are not philosophically trained, exposing them to action-guiding theories, presenting them with the codes of ethics of several companies and professional organizations and asking them to make ethical decisions in scenario-based cases. This approach is deliberately action-based and focuses on doing. "What would you do?" is the traditional question we ask our students. While this pedagogical methodology forces them to examine situations and argue from a particular point of view, it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Reading Habermas.David M. Rasmussen - 1992 - Studies in Soviet Thought 44 (2):156-158.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations