Switch to: Citations

References in:

Arbitrage arguments

Erkenntnis 30 (1-2):5 - 22 (1989)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Ulysses and the Sirens: studies in rationality and irrationality.Jon Elster (ed.) - 1984 - Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.
    This book was first published in 1984, as the revised edition of a 1979 original. The text is composed of studies in a descending sequence from perfect rationality, through imperfect and problematical rationality, to irrationality. Specifically human rationality is characterized by its capacity to relate strategically to the future, in contrast to the myopic 'gradient climbing' of natural selection. There is trenchant analysis of some of the parallels proposed in this connection between the biological and the social sciences. In the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   108 citations  
  • The Methodology of Positive Economics.Milton Friedman - 1953 - In Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press. pp. 3-43.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   281 citations  
  • Review of Milton Friedman: Capitalism and Freedom[REVIEW]Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   688 citations  
  • What economics is not: An economist's response to Rosenberg.Douglas W. Hands - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503.
    Alexander Rosenberg (1983) has argued, contrary to his previous work in the philosophy of economics, that economics is not science, and it is merely mathematics. The following paper argues that Rosenberg fails to demonstrate either of these two claims. The questions of the predictive weakness of modern economics and the cognitive standing of abstract economic theory are discussed in detail.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • What Rosenberg's philosophy of economics is not.Alexander Rosenberg - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):127-132.
    Douglas W. Hands's “What Economics Is Not: An Economist's Response to Rosenberg“ is an unsympathetic criticism of the explanatory hypotheses of “If Economics Isn't Science, What Is It?”. Before replying to his objection, I summarize the claims of that paper.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Rhetoric of Economics.Deirdre N. Mccloskey - 1986 - Brighton, Sussex : Wheatsheaf Books.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   208 citations  
  • Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality.Jon Elster - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 48 (4):650-651.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   205 citations