Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture.Clifford Geertz - 2003 - In Gerard Delanty & Piet Strydom (eds.), Philosophies of social science: the classic and contemporary readings. Phildelphia: Open University.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   724 citations  
  • Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.Charles Taylor - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):3 - 51.
    Interpretation, in the sense relevant to hermeneutics, is an attempt to make clear, to make sense of an object of study. This object must, therefore, be a text or a text-analogue, which in some way is confused, incomplete, cloudy, seemingly contradictory--in one way or another, unclear. The interpretation aims to bring to light an underlying coherence or sense.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   218 citations  
  • A Response to Jones’s Critique of Interpretive Social Science.Daniel A. Segal - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):306-309.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Interpretation of Cultures.Clifford Geertz - 2017
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   784 citations  
  • How Narratives Explain.Paul Roth - 1989 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 56.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Social epistemology and the ethics of research.David Resnik - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4):565-586.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Arbitrary arbitrariness: Reply to Segal.Todd Jones - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):310-314.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Interpretive social science and the "native's point of view": A closer look.Todd Jones - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1):32-68.
    In the past two decades, many anthropologists have been drawn to "interpre tive" perspectives which hold that the study of human culture would profit by using approaches developed in the humanities, rather than using approaches used in the natural sciences. The author discusses the source of the appeal of such perspectives but argues that interpretive approaches to social science tend to be fundamentally flawed, even by common everyday epistemological standards.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations