Switch to: Citations

References in:

Two Varieties of “Better-For” Judgements

In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts (eds.), Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 249--263 (2009)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children.Julian Savulescu - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (5-6):413-426.
    We have a reason to use information which is available about such genes in our reproductive decision-making; (3) couples should selec.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   272 citations  
  • Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent.P. Herissone-Kelly - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):166-169.
    Julian Savulescu has given clear expression to a principle—that of “procreative beneficence”—which underlies the thought of many contemporary writers on bioethics. The principle of procreative beneficence holds that parents or single reproducers are at least prima facie obliged to select the child, out of a range of possible children they might have, who will be likely to lead the best life. My aim in this paper is to argue that prospective parents, just by dint of their being prospective parents, are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    Challenging, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity, Parfit claims that we have a false view about our own nature. It is often rational to act against our own best interersts, he argues, and most of us have moral views that are self-defeating. We often act wrongly, although we know there will be no one with serious grounds for complaint, and when we consider future generations it is very hard to avoid conclusions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2875 citations  
  • Assent and selective abortion: a response to Rhodes and Häyry.Simo Vehmas - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (4):433-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • In defence of Procreative Beneficence.J. Savulescu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):284-288.
    Why potential parents should select the best child of possible children, and the necessity of a dialogue about the context of a reproductive decision.The principle of Procreative Beneficence is the principle of selecting the best child of the possible children one could have. This principle is elaborated on and defended against a range of objections. In particular, focus is laid on four objections that Michael Parker raises: that it is underdetermining, that it is insensitive to the complex nature of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • The best possible child.M. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):279-283.
    Julian Savulescu argues for two principles of reproductive ethics: reproductive autonomy and procreative beneficence, where the principle of procreative beneficence is conceptualised in terms of a duty to have the child, of the possible children that could be had, who will have the best opportunity of the best life. Were it to be accepted, this principle would have significant implications for the ethics of reproductive choice and, in particular, for the use of prenatal testing and other reproductive technologies for the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Aristotle's Philosophy of Friendship.Suzanne Stern-Gillet - 1995 - State University of New York Press.
    Presents the major issues in Aristotle's writings on Friendship.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations