Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A defense of unqualified medical confidentiality.Kenneth Kipnis - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):7 – 18.
    It is broadly held that confidentiality may be breached when doing so can avert grave harm to a third party. This essay challenges the conventional wisdom. Neither legal duties, personal morality nor personal values are sufficient to ground professional obligations. A methodology is developed drawing on core professional values, the nature of professions, and the justification for distinct professional obligations. Though doctors have a professional obligation to prevent public peril, they do not honor it by breaching confidentiality. It is shown (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • (1 other version)Health Information Privacy and Public Health.James G. Hodge - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):663-671.
    Protecting the privacy of individually-identifiable health data and promoting the public’s health often seem at odds. Privacy advocates consistently seek to limit the acquisition, use, and disclosure of identifiable health information in governmental and private sector settings. Their concerns relate to misuses or wrongful disclosures of sensitive health data that can lead to discrimination and stigmatization against individuals. Public health practitioners, on the other hand, seek regular, ongoing access to and use of identifiable health information to accomplish important public health (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Health Information Privacy and Public Health.James G. Hodge - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):663-671.
    Protecting the privacy of individually-identifiable health data and promoting the public’s health often seem at odds. Privacy advocates consistently seek to limit the acquisition, use, and disclosure of identifiable health information in governmental and private sector settings. Their concerns relate to misuses or wrongful disclosures of sensitive health data that can lead to discrimination and stigmatization against individuals. Public health practitioners, on the other hand, seek regular, ongoing access to and use of identifiable health information to accomplish important public health (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Challenging Themes in American Health Information Privacy and the Public’s Health: Historical and Modern Assessments.James G. Hodge & Kieran G. Gostin - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):670-679.
    Protecting the privacy of individually-identifiable health data is a dominant health policy objective in the new millennium. Technological, economic, and health-related reasons substantiate the development of a national electronic health information infrastructure. Through this emerging infrastructure, billions of pieces of health data of varying sensitivities are exchanged annually to provide health care services and service transactions, conduct health research, and promote the public’s health. These multi-purpose, rapid exchanges of electronic health data, far removed from the typical disclosure of health information (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Challenging Themes in American Health Information Privacy and the Public’s Health: Historical and Modern Assessments.James G. Hodge & Kieran G. Gostin - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):670-679.
    Protecting the privacy of individually-identifiable health data is a dominant health policy objective in the new millennium. Technological, economic, and health-related reasons substantiate the development of a national electronic health information infrastructure. Through this emerging infrastructure, billions of pieces of health data of varying sensitivities are exchanged annually to provide health care services and service transactions, conduct health research, and promote the public’s health. These multi-purpose, rapid exchanges of electronic health data, far removed from the typical disclosure of health information (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)An Enhanced Approach to Distinguishing Public Health Practice and Human Subjects Research.James G. Hodge - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):125-141.
    What are the Differences between Public Health Practice and Research? This perplexing question constantly arises in the planning and performance of public health activities involving the acquisition and use of identifiable health information. Public health agencies collect and analyze significant identifiable health data from health care providers, insurers, other agencies, or individuals to perform an array of public health activities. These activities include surveillance, epidemiological investigations, and evaluation and monitoring. Few debate that these essential public health activities, often specifically authorized (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations