Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Richard M. Shiffrin & Walter Schneider - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (2):128-90.
    Tested the 2-process theory of detection, search, and attention presented by the current authors in a series of experiments. The studies demonstrate the qualitative difference between 2 modes of information processing: automatic detection and controlled search; trace the course of the learning of automatic detection, of categories, and of automatic-attention responses; and show the dependence of automatic detection on attending responses and demonstrate how such responses interrupt controlled processing and interfere with the focusing of attention. The learning of categories is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   800 citations  
  • The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.J. A. Easterbrook - 1959 - Psychological Review 66 (3):183-201.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   135 citations  
  • Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view.Charles S. Carver & Michael F. Scheier - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (1):19-35.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   101 citations  
  • Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: Positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing.Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (5):839-855.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing.Karen Gasper - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (3):405-421.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Threat ≠ prevention, challenge ≠ promotion: The impact of threat, challenge and regulatory focus on attention to negative stimuli.Kai Sassenberg, Claudia Sassenrath & Adam K. Fetterman - 2015 - Cognition and Emotion 29 (1):188-195.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Incongruency effects in affective processing: Automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience?Klaus Rothermund, Anne Gast & Dirk Wentura - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (3):413-425.
    Attention is automatically allocated to stimuli that are opposite in valence to the current motivational focus (Rothermund, 2003; Rothermund, Voss, & Wentura, 2008). We tested whether this incongruency effect is due to affective–motivational counter-regulation or to an increased salience of stimuli that mismatch with cognitively activated information. Affective processing biases were assessed with a search task in which participants had to detect the spatial position at which a positive or negative stimulus was presented. In the motivational condition, positive or negative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • On the dynamics of implicit emotion regulation: Counter-regulation after remembering events of high but not of low emotional intensity.Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (6):971-992.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations