Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Do Socially Responsible Fund Managers Really Invest Differently?Karen L. Benson, Timothy J. Brailsford & Jacquelyn E. Humphrey - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):337-357.
    To date, research into socially responsible investment (SRI), and in particular the socially responsible investment funds industry, has focused on whether investing in SRI assets has any differential impact on investor returns. Prior findings generally suggest that, on a risk-adjusted basis, there is no difference in performance between SRI and conventional funds. This result has led to questions about whether SRI funds are really any different from conventional funds. This paper examines whether the portfolio allocation across industry sectors and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Australian Socially Responsible Funds: Performance, Risk and Screening Intensity. [REVIEW]Jacquelyn E. Humphrey & Darren D. Lee - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):519-535.
    We investigate the performance and risk of Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) equity funds in the Australian market and find no significant difference between the returns of SRI and conventional funds. In an extension to prior literature, we examine the impact of the number of positive, negative and total screens funds impose on performance and risk. We find little evidence of positive or negative screening impacting total return, but find weak evidence that funds with more screens overall provide better risk-adjusted performance. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Socially Responsible Mutual Funds.[author unknown] - 2003 - Business Ethics: The Magazine of Corporate Responsibility 17 (1):19-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations