Switch to: Citations

References in:

Note on contraries and subcontraries

Noûs 37 (4):690–705 (2003)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Intrinsic/extrinsic.I. L. Humberstone - 1996 - Synthese 108 (2):205-267.
    Several intrinsic/extrinsic distinctions amongst properties, current in the literature, are discussed and contrasted. The proponents of such distinctions tend to present them as competing, but it is suggested here that at least three of the relevant distinctions (including here that between non-relational and relational properties) arise out of separate perfectly legitimate intuitive considerations: though of course different proposed explications of the informal distinctions involved in any one case may well conflict. Special attention is paid to the question of whether a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   92 citations  
  • What is a logical constant?Christopher Peacocke - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (9):221-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • (1 other version)Defining 'intrinsic'.Rae Langton & David Lewis - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):333-345.
    Something could be round even if it were the only thing in the universe, unaccompanied by anything distinct from itself. Jaegwon Kim once suggested that we define an intrinsic property as one that can belong to something unaccompanied. Wrong: unaccompaniment itself is not intrinsic, yet it can belong to something unaccompanied. But there is a better Kim-style definition. Say that P is independent of accompaniment iff four different cases are possible: something accompanied may have P or lack P, something unaccompanied (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   206 citations  
  • Relevant identity.Philip Kremer - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (2):199-222.
    We begin to fill a lacuna in the relevance logic enterprise by providing a foundational analysis of identity in relevance logic. We consider rival interpretations of identity in this context, settling on the relevant indiscernibility interpretation, an interpretation related to Dunn's relevant predication project. We propose a general test for the stability of an axiomatisation of identity, relative to this interpretation, and we put various axiomatisations to this test. We fill our discussion out with both formal and philosophical remarks on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • 'Strong' and 'global' supervenience revisited.Jaegwon Kim - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (December):315-26.
    THIS PAPER CORRECTS AN ERROR IN MY EARLIER PAPER, "CONCEPTS OF SUPERVENIENCE" ("PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH", VOLUME 45, 1984), AND PRESENTS FURTHER MATERIAL ON SUPERVENIENCE. THE ERROR IS THE CLAIM THAT "GLOBAL" SUPERVENIENCE ENTAILS "STRONG" SUPERVENIENCE. HOWEVER, IT IS ARGUED THAT THIS FAILURE OF ENTAILMENT ONLY GOES TO SHOW THE INADEQUACY OF GLOBAL SUPERVENIENCE AS AN EXPLICATION OF "DEPENDENCY" OR "DETERMINATION" RELATION, AND, IN PARTICULAR, THAT MATERIALISM FORMULATED IN TERMS OF GLOBAL SUPERVENIENCE APPEARS TOO WEAK. (IT IS POINTED OUT, AMONG (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   84 citations  
  • Contrariety.Storrs McCall - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (1-2):121-132.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Extrinsic properties.David Lewis - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (2):197-200.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   204 citations  
  • Questions about quantifiers.Johan van Benthem - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):443-466.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • Classical logical relations.A. J. Baker - 1977 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (1):164-168.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Relevant predication 2: Intrinsic properties and internal relations.J. Michael Dunn - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 60 (3):177-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Contraries and subcontraries.David H. Sanford - 1968 - Noûs 2 (1):95-96.
    If two statements are contraries if and only if they cannot both be true, but can both be false, then some corresponding A and E categorical statements are not contraries, even on the presupposition that something exists which satisfies the subject term. For some such statements are necessarily true and thus cannot be false. There is a similar problem with subcontraries.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Contraries and the cubes and disks of opposition.Philip L. Peterson - 1995 - Metaphilosophy 26 (1-2):107-137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Supervenience, realism, necessity.I. G. McFetridge - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (140):245-258.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Relevant predication 1: The formal theory. [REVIEW]J. Michael Dunn - 1987 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 16 (4):347-381.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations