Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Adolescent Psychological Development, Parenting Styles, and Pediatric Decision Making.B. C. Partridge - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):518-525.
    The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child risks harm to adolescents insofar as it encourages not only poor decision making by adolescents but also parenting styles that will have an adverse impact on the development of mature decision-making capacities in them. The empirical psychological and neurophysiological data weigh against augmenting and expression of the rights of children. Indeed, the data suggest grounds for expanding parental authority, not limiting its scope. At the very least, any adequate appreciation of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Toward a Coherent Account of Pediatric Decision Making.Ana S. Iltis - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552.
    Within and among societies, there are competing understandings of the status of children, including debates over whether they can bear rights and, if so, which rights they bear and against whom, and their capacity to make decisions and be held responsible and accountable for actions. There also are different understandings of what constitutes a family; what authority parents have over and regarding their children; and what should happen to children who are without parents because of death, desertion, or imprisonment. These (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Religion in Bioethics: A Rebirth.Kevin Wm Wildes - 2002 - Christian Bioethics 8 (2):163-174.
    Kevin Wm. Wildes, S.J.; Religion in Bioethics: A Rebirth, Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, Volume 8, Issue 2, 1 January 2002, Pa.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Against Consensus: Christians and Public Bioethics.Gilbert Meilaender - 2005 - Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (1):75-88.
    The author suggests that Christian participation in public policy deliberations about bioethical issues may be helped by structures which do not require the search for consensus (or, in particular, the kind of ‘overlapping consensus’ favoured by Rawlsians) on policy. This argument is made, first, by a general discussion of the place of religious visions within public discourse and, second, by an examination of the structure and some of the reports of the President’s Council on Bioethics (USA).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Care theory and the ideal of neutrality in public moral discourse.Ruth Groenhout - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2):170 – 189.
    In this paper I argue that Care theory has the resources to offer an insightful and original theoretical perspective on issues in medical ethics. The paper begins with a discussion of the sort of theory Care is, and argues that it closely resembles virtue theory. After a discussion of cammon features of Care theories, I respond to a few of the criticisme that have been levied against the theory. The final section of the paper is a discussion of the question (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Can Theology Have a Role in “Public” Bioethical Discourse?Lisa Sowle Cahill - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (4):10-14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Children's Capacities to Decide about Participation in Research.Lois A. Weithorn - 1983 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 5 (2):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The Failed Search for the Neutral in the Secular: Public Bioethics in the Face of the Culture Wars.A. S. Iltis - 2009 - Christian Bioethics 15 (3):220-233.
    Public bioethics focuses on deliberating about, recommending, or establishing social policies or practices concerning health care and biotechnology. A brace of premises underlies much of the work of public bioethics. First, there is the view that, if one approaches reality and human life as if both were without ultimate significance, one will find that one shares a common public bioethics. That is, if one abstains not only from any religious concerns, but even from philosophical reflections on the circumstance that life (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations