Switch to: Citations

References in:

Which Fitch?

Analysis 81 (3):436-439 (2021)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Theory of Truthmaking: Metaphysics, Ontology, and Reality.Jamin Asay - 2020 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    The theory of truthmaking has long aroused skepticism from philosophers who believe it to be tangled up in contentious ontological commitments and unnecessary theoretical baggage. In this book, Jamin Asay shows why that suspicion is unfounded. Challenging the current orthodoxy that truthmaking's fundamental purpose is to be a tool for explaining why truths are true, Asay revives the conception of truthmaking as fundamentally an exercise in ontology: a means for coordinating one's beliefs about what is true and one's ontological commitments. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • A short argument for truthmaker maximalism.Mark Jago - 2020 - Analysis 80 (1):40-44.
    Each truth has a truthmaker: an entity in virtue of whose existence that truth is true. So say truthmaker maximalists. Arguments for maximalism are hard to find, whereas those against are legion. Most accept that maximalism comes at a significant cost, which many judge to be too high. The scales would seem to be balanced against maximalism. Yet, as I show here, maximalism can be derived from an acceptable premise which many will pre-theoretically accept.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Knowability Noir: 1945-1963.Joe Salerno - 2008 - In New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Truthmaker.John F. Fox - 1987 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (2):188 – 207.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   108 citations  
  • Truthmaking, grounding and Fitch’s paradox.Robert Trueman - 2021 - Analysis 81 (2):270-274.
    Jago and Loss have recently used variations on Fitch's paradox to argue that every truth has a truthmaker, and that every fact is grounded. In this paper, I show that Fitch's paradox can also be adapted to prove the exact opposite conclusions: no truth has a truthmaker, and no fact is grounded. All of these arguments are as dialectically effective as each other, and so they are all in bad company.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Referee reports on Fitch's "definition of value".Alonzo Church - 2008 - In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 13--20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • How to Be a Truthmaker Maximalist.Ross P. Cameron - 2008 - Noûs 42 (3):410 - 421.
    When there is truth, there must be some thing (or things) to account for that truth: some thing(s) that couldn’t exist and the true proposition fail to be true. That is the truthmaker principle. True propositions are made true by entities in the mind-independently existing external world. The truthmaker principle seems attractive to many metaphysicians, but many have wanted to weaken it and accept not that every true proposition has a truthmaker but only that some important class of propositions require (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   81 citations  
  • Truthmakers for negative truths.George Molnar - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):72 – 86.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   124 citations  
  • Truthmakers, entailment and necessity.Greg Restall - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):331 – 340.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   132 citations