Switch to: Citations

References in:

Remarks on Second-Order Consequence

Theoria 18 (2):179-187 (2010)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Second-order languages and mathematical practice.Stewart Shapiro - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):714-742.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • A critical appraisal of second-order logic.Ignacio Jané - 1993 - History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (1):67-86.
    Because of its capacity to characterize mathematical concepts and structures?a capacity which first-order languages clearly lack?second-order languages recommend themselves as a convenient framework for much of mathematics, including set theory. This paper is about the credentials of second-order logic:the reasons for it to be considered logic, its relations with set theory, and especially the efficacy with which it performs its role of the underlying logic of set theory.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Logical truth and tarskian logical truth.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 1998 - Synthese 117 (3):375-408.
    This paper examines the question of the extensional correctness of Tarskian definitions of logical truth and logical consequence. I identify a few different informal properties which are necessary for a sentence to be an informal logical truth and look at whether they are necessary properties of Tarskian logical truths. I examine arguments by John Etchemendy and Vann McGee to the effect that some of those properties are not necessary properties of some Tarskian logical truths, and find them unconvincing. I stress (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • A note on formality and logical consequence.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (5):529-539.
    Logic is formal in the sense that all arguments of the same form as logically valid arguments are also logically valid and hence truth-preserving. However, it is not known whether all arguments that are valid in the usual model-theoretic sense are truthpreserving. Tarski claimed that it could be proved that all arguments that are valid (in the sense of validity he contemplated in his 1936 paper on logical consequence) are truthpreserving. But he did not offer the proof. The question arises (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations