Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Can arguments address concerns?M. Hayry - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):598-600.
    People have concerns, and ethicists often respond to them with philosophical arguments. But can conceptual constructions properly address fears and anxieties? It is argued in this paper that while it is possible to voice, clarify, create and—to a certain extent—tackle concerns by arguments, more concrete practices, choices, and actions are normally needed to produce proper responses to people’s worries. While logical inconsistencies and empirical errors can legitimately be exposed by arguments, the situation is considerably less clear when it comes to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson's analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations.J. Deckers - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):160-164.
    The scope of embryo research in the UK has been expanded by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Regulations 2001. Two advisory bodies—the Chief Medical Officer’s Expert Group and the House of Lords’ Select Committee—presented various arguments in favour of embryo research. One of these is the view that, just as lottery tickets have relatively little value before the draw because of the low probability of their being the winning ticket, early embryos have relatively little value because of the presumed low (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations