Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Harm of Ableism: Medical Error and Epistemic Injustice.David M. Peña-Guzmán & Joel Michael Reynolds - 2019 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 29 (3):205-242.
    This paper argues that epistemic errors rooted in group- or identity- based biases, especially those pertaining to disability, are undertheorized in the literature on medical error. After sketching dominant taxonomies of medical error, we turn to the field of social epistemology to understand the role that epistemic schemas play in contributing to medical errors that disproportionately affect patients from marginalized social groups. We examine the effects of this unequal distribution through a detailed case study of ableism. There are four primary (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Caring, control, and clinicians' influence: Ethical dilemmas in development disabilities.Sandra L. Friedman, David T. Helm & Joseph Marrone - 1999 - Ethics and Behavior 9 (4):349 – 364.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Electronic health record as a panopticon: A disciplinary apparatus in nursing practice.Jessica Dillard-Wright - 2019 - Nursing Philosophy 20 (2):e12239.
    The specific arrangements of power/knowledge that characterize nurse interactions with the electronic health record form a panopticon. As health care moves into the 21st century, sophisticated technologies like the electronic health record shape the terrain of professional possibilities. The longer it is in use, the more it is possible to excavate the inherent disciplinary function of electronic health record. A panopticon is a generalizable, replicable apparatus of power that cultivates discipline when similar behaviours are desired from a group of people. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations