Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Naive Set Theory. [REVIEW]Elliott Mendelson - 1960 - Journal of Philosophy 57 (15):512-513.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Review of Milton Friedman: Capitalism and Freedom[REVIEW]Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   685 citations  
  • Balancing Ethical Responsibility among Multiple Organizational Stakeholders: The Islamic Perspective.Rafik I. Beekun & Jamal A. Badawi - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):131-145.
    In spite of a renewed interest in the relationship between spirituality and managerial thinking, the literature covering the link between Islam and management has been sparse – especially in the area of ethics. One potential reason may be the cultural diversity of nearly 1.3 billion Muslims globally. Yet, one common element binding Muslim individuals and countries is normative Islam. Using all four sources of this religion’s teachings, we outline the parameters of an Islamic model of normative business ethics. We explain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • (1 other version)Naive Set Theory.Paul R. Halmos & Patrick Suppes - 1961 - Synthese 13 (1):86-87.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Principles of Economics.John S. Mackenzie - 1891 - Mind 16 (61):110-113.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   159 citations  
  • (1 other version) The Foundations of Business Ethics.Robert Allinson - 2008 - In Corporate and White-Collar Crime. pp. 81-101.
    While theoretically, egoism may be considered one kind of ethics, generally speaking, egoism, defined as self-interest at the expense of others, is contrary to the central principles of ethics, which are, in the main, other-directed. While Adam Smith's economics is famously argued to serve both self and other, the core thesis of this chapter is that Adam Smith's position is seriously flawed. The chapter argues that self-interest economics is fundamentally flawed and needs to be replaced by an objective, value-based economics. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation