Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Introduction to mathematical logic.Elliott Mendelson - 1964 - Princeton, N.J.,: Van Nostrand.
    The Fourth Edition of this long-established text retains all the key features of the previous editions, covering the basic topics of a solid first course in ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   188 citations  
  • Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2874 citations  
  • Model theory for modal logic—part II The elimination of de re modality.Kit Fine - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):277 - 306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • (1 other version)Formal Logic.Arthur N. Prior & Norman Prior - 1955 - Oxford,: Oxford University Press.
    This book was designed primarily as a textbook; though the author hopes that it will prove to be of interests to others beside logic students. Part I of this book covers the fundamentals of the subject the propositional calculus and the theory of quantification. Part II deals with the traditional formal logic and with the developments which have taken that as their starting-point. Part III deals with modal, three-valued, and extensional systems.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  • On de dicto modalities in quantified S.Pavel Tichy - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (3):387 - 392.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)ModelTtheory for Modal Logic. Part I — The de re/de Dicto distinction.Kit Fine - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):125 - 156.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Do Modal Distinctions Collapse in Carnap’s System?Genoveva Marti - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (6):575 - 593.
    Føllesdal (1966 and 1969) claims that modal distinctions collapse, that is that p and Necessarily p are equivalent, in any system of modal logic that incorporates a standard theory of definite descriptions, like the one proposed by Carnap in M&N. I argue that his argument fails.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Modality and quantification in S5.A. N. Prior - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1):60-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • The elimination of de re modalities.M. J. Cresswell - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):329-330.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (4 other versions)Formal Logic.A. N. Prior - 1964 - Studia Logica 15:298-301.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Normal modal model theory.Kenneth A. Bowen - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (2):97 - 131.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (1 other version)Model Theory for Modal Logic. Part I--the de Re/De Dicto Distinction.Kit Fine - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (4):1083-1093.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations